Looking closer at the top areas with tennis provision in the South East, 44% and 45% of the Redhill and Guildford populations were in the 01 to 03 CAMEO Groups. This compared to an average of 23% for all Postcode Areas in the UK. Cambridge, Tunbridge Wells and Oxford had 28%, 32% and 36% of their populations in these CAMEO groups. Of the top areas in the South East had a population rate for the lowest three CAMEO groups, 08 to 10, under 19%. This reiterates how these areas, with such high tennis provision, have a more affluent population.
Motherwell, Wigan, Liverpool, Oldham and London Eastern Central are the areas with lowest tennis provision in the country. Looking at the CAMEO data, this emphasised the wealth disparity that could be linked with tennis provision. Except for London Eastern Central, all these areas had a below average population rate of the 01 to 03 CAMEO Groups. Wigan, Oldham and Liverpool had respective 01 to 03 population rate of 5%, 6% and 10%, whilst Motherwell had 20%. Whereas they had high populations of the bottom three CAMEO Groups 08 to 10, with Wigan, Oldham and Liverpool having 51%, 61%, and 56% of their populations in these CAMEO Groups.
Our initial location analysis suggests that tennis does indeed correlate with wealth, and the spatial correlation between tennis provision and affluence reiterates that there is perhaps a north south divide to tennis. This could be due to private schools having better tennis provision, as well as exclusivity around tennis clubs and high membership costs excluding the less affluent portion of society.
We hope that this years Wimbledon can inspire those from all backgrounds to get out on the court! And to of course enjoy your strawberries and cream, even if you haven’t been lucky enough to get tickets to this year’s tournament.